pete roper Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 Oh god. Do I need to upgrade? Will this never end?!!! Nah, the only reason I went from 2mm to 1.6mm plate is because the plate had almost doubled in cost over a period of a couple of months! The place I have make them had some 1.6mm plate lying about so I snapped it up 'cos it was a lot cheaper! Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ratchethack Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Nah, the only reason I went from 2mm to 1.6mm plate is because the plate had almost doubled in cost over a period of a couple of months! The place I have make them had some 1.6mm plate lying about so I snapped it up 'cos it was a lot cheaper! Pete OMG, NO, Pete! A .4mm ENGINEERING CHANGE! D'you realize this'll launch a whole new round o' International conniption fits over new max and min marks on the dipstick, not to mention OIL VOLUME re-calculations with micro-pipettes, and a new monsoon blast o' windage over windage!!?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete roper Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 OMG, NO, Pete! A .4mm ENGINEERING CHANGE! D'you realize this'll launch a whole new round o' International conniption fits over new max and min marks on the dipstick, not to mention OIL VOLUME re-calculations with micro-pipettes, and a new monsoon blast o' windage over windage!!?? Oh lordy! I hadn't considered that! Hang on....... Interior of case measures about 200 by 180mm so a reduction in height will reduce the crankcase volume by about 14.4cc's Now allowing 1/3rd of that for gas volume that means that the amount of oil added should be reduced by 9.6cc's. I can't tell you how grateful I am for you pointing this out to me. Who knows what horrors would of befallen people otherwise Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryland3210 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Oh lordy! I hadn't considered that! Hang on....... Interior of case measures about 200 by 180mm so a reduction in height will reduce the crankcase volume by about 14.4cc's Now allowing 1/3rd of that for gas volume that means that the amount of oil added should be reduced by 9.6cc's. I can't tell you how grateful I am for you pointing this out to me. Who knows what horrors would of befallen people otherwise Pete And how about doubling up on gaskets to make up the difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now