GuzziMoto

Sorry.Not trying to single you out specifically.. Just speculation about the riding ability of the OP and all this B.S. about the dangers of the front brake and that if you use the front brake and not the rear atlow speeds you will surely crash.I thought those kinds of old wives tales were only for Harley riders. As far as Eales forks, I'm not that old but as I recall as long as the lower link is lower at the axle then at the rear pivot then it has anti-dive, whether intended or not. Closest I have come is racing a Tesi. Don't think a brake disk on one side or the other will make a bike pull left or right. But if your brakes malfunction it could cause the brakes to lock up suddenly like the OP experienced. But it also could just be an old tire.

Holy smokes. You mean my wife and I have been riding wrong all these years. Good lord. Thanks for saving us. Pardon the sarcasm, but the B.S. is getting mighty deep in this thread. It sounds like the OP has enough experience riding and probably doesn't need/want people he doesn't know telling him how to ride. The question was could there be something wrong with his V11 and if so, What? I've already thrown in my two cents on another board but once again I'll say yes, there may be something wrong. It could be the tire is too old, it could be one of the brake calipers is hanging up. This is not to imply that would cause the bike to "pull to one side". He never said it pulled to one side. He said (I believe) that when the front tire locked up it went to full lock to one side and he crashed. That is how you typically crash if and when you lock up the front brake. I have done it myself a few times (it's part of learning to race). The question seems to be why the front tire is locking up in situations that it probably should not be locking up in. Rant over. Please return to your normally scheduled programming. Michael.

If I remember correctly, the earlier red frame bikes had slightly more aggressive steering geometry.

The true irony is that putting a tarriff on small bore european bikes while have little impact except to put US importers of said bikes out of business. It will do little else. If the goal of the tarriff is to get the EU's attention and maybe get them to allow US beef in the EU, Put a tarriff on something they will notice like cars. That would get the EU's attention fast. European car makers sell a much larger percentage of the total volume in the US then european bike makers, more so small bore bikes. If the US really wants to man up and make a point, do it. Just don't B.S. around with half hearted attempts that will do little other then to hurt US importers (putting americans out of a job).

Cats do more then burn any unburned fuel in the exhaust. They also convert toxic emmissions to less toxic emmissions. They do tend to hurt power output. Mainly, I believe, due to the restriction in the exhaust. Newer cats hurt power less then older cats. Some systems use multiple cats to get around the restriction issue. I doubt cats hurt power anymore then any other emmissions requirements. As a rule, emmissions regs hurt power. That is just a fact of life nowadays. Cats have other downsides as well. There isn't much in life that doesn't have pros and cons. I imagine the pros outweigh the cons. I don't care one way or the other. I just accept them as part of a car now.

The more the spark is shrouded (as it is on the E3) the harder it is for the intial flame front to spread. I doubt it would be a big difference but it is going in the wrong direction if your after improved performance.

The Volt is NOT an electric car and it never HAS to be plugged in. You CAN plug it in to charge up the batteries while at home and I expect most people would do that most of the time. Electricity is cheaper then gasoline. The Volt will be far cheaper then a gasoline car for most people to operate if it does 3/4's of what is expected. $40,000 is not cheap but that puts it in the middle of the road for new car prices.

How is the volt impractical. It will go 40 miles on electric alone, then keep going as long as there is gas in the tank. It will seat five adults. No it will not crush cars like a giant SUV, but that is not my basis for practicality.

If you are using the generator in a true hybrid, the power output of the generator only needs to be the average of the power needed. The generator charges the batteries and they power the motors.

Unfortunately I fear most of Guzzis R&D for the airbox goes into figuring out how to make it fit and not so much how to get max power. But even the tube that connects the throttlebody to the airbox has an effect on power output. Getting rid of that tube should change the power delivery. Will it make a large difference?No, I doubt it.

It is a general rule of thumb that short intakes are better for top end power at the expense of torque, and longer intakes promote torque at the expense of top end power. This is just a general rule of thumb and not an absolute. There is also another concept that smooth airflow thru the throttle bodies/carbs is important and will improve power at all rpms. I find that on older bikes you lose less by fitting pods like that (you may even gain power), but the newer the bike the more you lose doing that. Airflow in is as important as airflow out.

There are lots of opinions on this, but I think it will work. Evidently, so does Chevy. http://www.chevrolet.com/electriccar/?seo=...al_|_chevy_volt The idea is sound. The only question is will the technology be up to it. The long and short of the electric car conspiracy is if there is profit to be made the cars will be built. Until they figure out how to do it at a profit and not price themselves out of the market nothing will happen. I hope Chevy has figured it out. I would never have thought I would say anything pro-Chevy five years ago.

That is the point of the Chevy Volt. It may turn out to be the first true hybrid, where like a diesel electric train the engine only generates electricity for the electric motors that propel the car. Current mainstream hybrids have been a disappointment to me. No politics involved. Plus, you can plug it in to charge the batteries. If you only drive short trips the engine will hardly ever run. But if you drive for a longer distance and the batteries run down the engine fires up and charges the batteries. Stupidly brilliant.

True, profit drives corperations. Not idealism, not conspiracies. There is no great conspiracy to kill the electric car. No, oil companies aren't for them but they can't stop them. What will stop them (atleast for a while) is the market. It is hard to sell someone an electric car that can only go 40 miles on a charge. Or an electric gas hybrid that gets 20% better mileage but costs 40% more money. When they become economically feasable they will happen. The cost of the technology will come down and the cost of oil will go up. Eventually it will be cheaper to be green.

They never sold or leased those cars to the public. Shame. The first concept seemed the best. Stop trying to make the internal combustion motor directly propel the vehicule. They work best at one speed, so hook them to a generator. Use electric motors to drive the vehicule.

Oh, a .gov site. That would explain it. I usually get close to the EPA highway mileage. But hybrids are notorious for getting less then rated, which is why I told my mother she would not get the 34 mpg Ford claimed for the Escape. Last I heard she gets around 28. But I thought it interesting that atleast some people say the Malibu hybrid gets HIGHER then EPA rated. As I said niether the Malibu or the Escape impresses me. Their technology is almost the same. The Malibu has a slight edge, mostly due to GM having better combustion effiecency. What I am most interested is a real hybrid along the lines of a diesel/electric locomotive. That is what the Volt may be.

Not sure where you got your numbers for the Escape hybrid, but they are wrong. The EPA combined number you listed for it is actually the EPA highway number I believe (I have not checked to confirm this, but I do not have time at the moment so if I'm wrong I'm sorry). My mother has one and it struggles to get 28 mpg in mostly highway driving with little real "city driving, she lives and works in the burbs. There is little difference between the Escape hybrid technology and the Malibu hybrid technology. And the differences there are lean mostly in the favor of the Malibu. Edit: After some quick checking, I see why you think the way you do. The Escape hybrid is somehow rated at 34 city/31 highway(2WD). But my mothers experience with hers is it cannot get out of the 20's, with 28 being typical. The Malibu hybrid, on the other hand, is rated at 24 city/ 34 highway. Yet the first test I pulled up on it said that it easily got 36.5 highway and 28.4 city average with 40 mpg on the highway being hit on occassion. So, EPA numbers are in Fords favor, real world numbers may be in Chevys favor. For clarification, I hate GM and have never bought one. I have drove other peoples on a number of occassions and that was enough. I will consider buying a GM when the Chevy Volt hits the market. That is a real Hybrid, the only one so far that is worth the name (and money).

Oh yeah, comparing a Prius to a Malibu hybrid is not fair. The Malibu is bigger. Bigger hurts mileage.

GM lost money on every one of those EV1's that it was leasing. How long should a company continue to lose money on a car before it ends the program. It cost more to build the EV1 then they could lease or sell them for. They knew going in that it was just a test. The technology was not yet cheap enough to be viable. But, atleast they tried. Nobody else has stepped up to the plate. The Ford Escape hybrid is no better then any of GM's hybrid. My mother has one. It gets about 4 mpg better mileage then a reg Escape. Yes, the Toyota and Honda hybrids are leading the way at the moment. But if they don't watch it, GM will leapfrog over them with the Volt. A true hybrid.

There's all kinds of aspects to the current situation. For one, GM is the most progressive of the big three US car makers. It is laughable that they get slammed as the one that killed the electric car when they are the only ones that have even tried to make an electric car profitable. They have yet to succed, but the Chevy Volt holds lots of promise. It overcomes the main problems (and reason why EV's have failed so far) of electric cars and puts Toyota and Honda to shame. As for should we "bail out" the big 3? as I understand it they want the Gov. to lend them money. Didn't they just shove a huge bail out of the financial industry down our throats under the guise of maintaining the flow of credit being crucial to the well being of the economy? More people would lose their jobs if the big 3 go bust then if the poorly run financial institutions were to go under. I don't support the gov. bailing out poorly run companies, but if your gonna do it for some,..... As far as the price of oil, I'm sure there are many factors involved in why the price was so high and why it is now much lower. One is surely supply and demand, but there are others like people speculating on the price of oil. This, coupled with the instability in the mid-east (we did that, our bad) can artificially inflate the price of oil. Hopefully the people doing that lost enough money when the market fell that they will stay away for a while at least. We in the US have also been helped by the global crunch, which brought the rest of the world closer to our level. Our economy has been in a decline for a few years now and this latest crash, while hurting us, has also helped us because we did not fall as far as much of the rest (we did not have as far to fall?). The thing that cracks me up is when someone says "we need to reduce our dependance on foreign oil so we will not have this problem (the problem being the instability of the oil market). They don't seem to understand that oil is a global commodity and it doesn't matter where it came from. Oil does not know where it comes from and does not care. If the price of oil on the world market goes up, the price of all oil goes up. It does not matter where it came from. The only way to reduce our oil dependancy is to reduce our oil usage. It's such a no brainer, but it is amazing how many people do not understand that basic concept. Rant over now, please resume your normally scheduled broadcast.

Ram mounts seem popular, but I find them hokey. These people sell both RAM mounts and their own brand which are sweet. http://www.touratech-usa.com/ They don't cater to Guzzi but are big with BMW and other adventure touring types.

Yes, the US uses an average of RON and MON, whereas much of the world uses just one of the two. Atleast a few bikes have reported issues with pinging to varying degrees. Most are closer to the 3-5k rpm range, but anything is possible. Before adding a PowerCommander I would either find a qualified Guzzi mechanic to go over your bike and set things like TPS and throttle body sync or read up on the info here at the site and do those things yourself. You may find you don't need the PC after all. But typically after freeing up the exhaust these bikes end up being a bit lean and a PC is the easiest way to richen it back up.

Don't know anything about the Centauro's except that I think they're way cool. On V11's they use micro relays to turn on and off all the major components like F.I., lights, etc. When a relay sticks(as they are prone to do) that circuit does not work. It is common to upgrade to a higher quality relay. Having said that, someting tells me older bikes like the Centauro do not use the same set up. But I could be wrong.

NAPA Gold filters are made by WIX and are the same high quality. I had a local private parts store around me that sold them but they went bust. Shame. So lately I've been buying the NAPA version. WIX has a web site with a store locator, though.

That's okay, in just over 11 months it will be Halloween again. My favorite time of the year.