The trip to Scotland provided an interesting test with the Griso. It turned the 1,000 miles mark and had fresh oil, so I was happy to wind it on more, though I'm still not running it at or over the redline.
There's no doubt that this is a revy motor. It wants to be at the top end.
The thing is that MG haven't got the right bike package for it yet. The Griso is a bit of a bizarre bike. Having discounted the 1100, I took a look at it again when the 1200 8V came out: because it was publicised as being a sportier model, with a sportier riding position. I really think that's more hype than anything sunstantial. It's still an odd mix of butch cruiser with sporting inclinations. Despite what the publicity intimated, the footpegs seem to me to be in exactly the same position as the 1100 and the bars, while narrower, are still very much sit up, sit back, arms out wide, head up. What's it all about? The bike wants to run, but the seating position means that the rider is constantly pushed back and sliding back.
For a start, some sort of fairing / screen should be a big improvement.
Why, with a motor like this, didn't they give it one as standard?
Even so, the seat could do with a re-shape and, for me, I want to do something different with the bars. I don't know what yet, because although it's relatively easy to put on straights or clip ons, I'm pretty much stuck with the foot peg / lever position. And it's a heavy, bulky lump.
Three of us, the G and 2 V.11s, went for a fast run over fairly empty and very twisty Scottish hill roads. To be honest, I found it hard work (very enjoyable work, mind) not because of the engine, nor because of the frame / running gear – they're all great – but because of the wind-blasted, upright and rearwards seating position.
The Stelvio review talks about maintaining speeds of 100mph: "sit-bolt-upright 100-mph nirvana ".
The stock Griso won't let you do that for any amount of time. It's a shame. Just what are these new models meant to be?
Of course I very much like the bike – and its potential. Enough to buy one. I'm just commenting on an unfortunate core deficiency in the design concept(?), which if addressed, would have made for a bike that was more coherent, made much more sense.