All Activity

You can do that but use Sta-Bil for non-alcohol fuel or Sta-Bil for alcohol fuel. IDK what the difference is but there is a difference.

Google does not agree that Zappa was strictly tonal: "Burnt Weeny Sandwich": The album includes atonal pieces like "Igor's Boogie" and "Kung Fu," which is a 1960s example of his use of atonal music. “ some of his orchestral compositions also include atonality my favorite Atonalist has to be Sun Ra… saw him with the Arkestra at Norma Jeans night club in the early 80’s.. best music I’ve ever witnessed live.

There is such a thing as horrid pie . . .

These pieces prove my point. They're still called 'music'. Absolutely Horrid.

What a National coincidence that many just happening to end up in the same place.

What about adding, to the ethanol-free fuel, a product like "Sta-Bil" fuel stabilizer?

Why not? If you can deal with Guzzi electrics, reading music should be easy as pie.

makes sense, and thats what i've done in the past, but never for as long. was just wondering if there were any other nifty hacks for that kind of thing. i'll drain and refill with fresh petrol... Probably the best habit to establish for this machine anyway, as it presumably will never be a regular rider bike, even when i've done what i'm going to do with her.

I don't read music, but I see a lot "whip-chow" . . .

Well, you may find it hard to believe, but Zappa was always radical, adventurous, experimental, brilliant, but strictly tonal. If you want atonal, try this. And that is not his most radical piece. : There are also things like this And Schönberg was a pioneer, but he was not alone.

I like how these guys follow “The "rules" of western tonal music”

Haha - yeah, "music is just A-B-C-D-E-F-G" as some smartaxx musician once told me. But, like, NEVER in that order. I thought neurophysiology was complicated. Until I picked up string instruments.

I beg to differ. The "rules" of western tonal music adhere to strict rules that are based in physics. Believe me, I have a Bachelor degree in music with a focus on 20th century music. Quite apart from that, it seems to me a paradox that the U.S.A. staged an heroic revolution to release themselves from the yoke of british imperialism, but didn't go the whole 9.144 metres and adopt the much more logical and sensible system that was proposed in France about a century earlier, and finalised about the same time as the revolution. PS: Australia is still nominally a "British Colony", but the sensible system of measurement was adopted about the end of the '60s, when I was about 7 years old.

Well there's the crux of it. Music isn't sensible. So we didn't convert to a system that accommodates both Beethoven and Thelonious Monk.

Well, yes, as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre_(music)

Isn't 'metre' a musical measurement?

Free to steal. Though 'intermittent Honkiness' came to mind.

Yes, I understood that. But what about sensible units, you know, millimetres and so on. Yes, I'm too lazy to look it up...

Fantastic. Can I use that? It would be very often useful to "explain" the behaviour of sound equipment.

"30/1000 of an inch, plus or less 10/1000 of an inch"