I received my Ride Texas magazine, and there is an article written by a specialist lawyer who provides legal services to motorcycle riders.
What he is stating is disturbing but given to what is happening in the USA lately, it may makes sense;
1) if you are injured in a crash, it is your responsibility to prove liability.
2) the Insurance company's initial move is to blame the motorcyclist, based on the general accepted perception that motorcycle riders are reckless.
3) In claims without witnesses or hard evidence, it is common from the opposing party to blame your riding as the cause for the accident.
4) According to the lawyer, a video recording does the following:
Show the exact timing of the impact (helps with proving the suspect was there in case of a hit and run, with later claim that he was never there in the first place).
Disprove false claims made by witnesses and the police officers; according to the lawyer, it is very common to have witnesses describing the incident in unfavorable ways for the motorcyclist, swaying the police report against him.
A recording my capture the driver's immediate action after the crash, such as fleeing the scene or initially accepting fault
In extreme cases, accident reconstruction experts will be able to analyze the dynamic of the accident.
What is disturbing, is he allegedly suggests police officers should not be trusted. Including the video camera they are supposed to wear to record any interaction. Those body camera are often not working, or footage lost, when it is convenient to them. In substance, he is saying that police cannot be trusted to do the right thing.
Does anyone here ride with a dash came on his bike(s), just as a tattle tale?